Wednesday, 24 February 2010

Self Evaluation

The pitch that we presented for our Critical Investigation, the freedback we received is shown below:

WWW:

* The feedback we receieved for WWW is that we found that the class thought that our presentation was very detailed and organised. This was because we had mentioned a lot of media related things in our presentation in order for it to seem like a pitch in reality.

* Another one of our WWW was that we had excellent presentation skills as we were having a conversation within our presentation. This made the class feel that we were presented in an excellent way because we had a different style of presenting in order to make sure that everyone is focused on our presentation.

* In our presentation we also had competitor information as we showed the circulation of our competitors. This was a thing that the class liked as it was one of our WWW. This showed that we looked at our competitors in depth and had carried out research on what their circulation is and how we can become better than them.

* Another one of our WWW was that we had balanced work spread. This was because we all had even parts in the presentation when presenting and not only one person was talking. By this it was clear that we had made sure that everyone is given the equal amount of speaking to ensure that everyone is involved.

* We also had a mock up of a magazine on the presentation. This was something that the class liked because we were giving them an idea of how our magazine will look and how it will be better from the competitors magazines. This was something we had thought about because in a pitch we thought there should be a mock up so the audience has an idea of what the magazine will look like.

* Our presentation only had mainly images which was something the class had liked. This meant that there was hardly any writing on the presentation because it was based on images. By this we were making sure that the audience enjoys the presentation because they would not have anything to read but would just watch the images and enjoy the presentation.

EBI:

* The EBI feedback that we got from the class was that the class thought that we should of not read off the paper and we should of talked without the paper. This was because the audience wanted to see us looking up at them more and not looking down and reading off the paper.

* The class also said that they think that we should of been positioned in front of the board and not on the side. This would mean that when we do another presentation we would need to make sure that we are positioned in front of the board so that the audience can see us properly.

* Another EBI that the audience wanted on the presentation is publisher information because we had institution infromation but did not on the publisher. This would mean that we would need to make sure that we have some information on the publisher to show more of our research.

No comments:

Post a Comment