WWW . . .
From the feedback I received from the class, I found that the things that went well with my presentation were that mainly all the topics were mentioned well and I had analysed the film closely as I had a lot of information on the film. This showed that one of the strong points about my presentation was that I had studied the film closely to ensure that I know everything I need to about the film. Another WWW I found in my research was that I used a lot of media terminology such as Todorov's theory, Uses and Gratifications theory, protagonist, catharsis and tag line. In my presentation, I had mainly images on the slides which meant that I was not reading off the board and was able to interest the audience with the use of images rather than making the audience read of the board. The colour scheme of my film was another thing that was good about my presentation as it went with the film.
EBI . . .
The things that I could have done better in my presentation was that I was reading too much of the paper which meant that there was not a lot of eye contact with the audience. I also need to improve on the representation of the film as I could have mentioned much more on the representation of the film which I did not do. Another thing that could have been better about my presentation was the introduction as I could of explained the introduction properly to the audience to ensure they have a more insight on the film. Also, in my presentation I mentioned economical factors which I could have elaborated on so that the audience was more aware of the issue.
Feedback from the Class . . .
Significance - 1
Structure - 2
Simplicity - 2
Rehearsal - 3
No comments:
Post a Comment